Media Matters And The Neocons

They shouldn’t fool anyone, but they do.

George Soros funded / hyper leftist / Marx pandering TV “watch dog group” Media Matters has its collective panties in a knot because Fox News big shot Rupert Murdoch has publicly agreed with fellow neocon Glen Beck that President Obama is a racist. “He was right,” said Murdoch.
In July 2008, Glenn Beck notoriously declared that he believes President Obama is “a racist” with a “deep-seated hatred for white people or the white culture.” For a dyed in the wool neocon who regularly condemns even the remotest form of American white nationalism this is big news. Of course, Beck’s comments played a key part in at least 80 bedwetting advertisers dropping their support of his television program. Various media outlets and talking heads admonished his comments, but Fox News let Beck slide. Why? Because Rupert Murdoch, chairman of News Corp., the parent company of Fox News, says he agrees that President Obama is a racist. Moreover Murdoch went on to say: “And, you know, that was something which perhaps shouldn’t have been said about the president, but if you actually assess what he was talking about, he [Beck] was right.” Media Matters says this is a new low even for Fox, and it is a low they cannot let slide.

NOTE; American White Nationalists have been warning their fellow Americans about Obama’s race hate for years prior to his White House bid. Thanks Rupert.

Therefore George Soros funded / hyper leftist / Marx pandering TV “watch dog group” Media Matters now wants to hold Rupert the Neocon responsible and command that he apologize for his own “intolerable” remarks. They have even gone so far as to reserve some of their unlimited bandwidth in order to deliver signatures to News Corp and demand Murdoch apologize via\action\murdochapology.

Never mind the fact non-white groups have been making off with billions of dollars of taxpayer operating money, specifically in order to maintain their ethnic platforms. Not a peep about it.

The way Media Matters sees it “this type of race-baiting is par for the course for Fox News.” They even cite Fox News president Roger Ailes who has imitated the far left by spending “the better part of his career working as a Republican media consultant, during which time he became known for appealing to racial fears and biases for political gain. Under Ailes’ leadership Fox News routinely employs these same tactics in its ongoing campaign to destroy the Obama administration and the progressive agenda.”  (They actually mean their Frankfurt School / Critical Theory agenda.)

But let’s keep it real here. Glen Becks’ remarks about Obama are an anomaly, and he would just as soon allow himself to be ripped to shreds taking on “white racists” like Jared Taylor or Professor Kevin McDonald. As a neoconservative Beck is part a cabal whose core group consists of neoconservative defense intellectuals, corporate open border advocates, and “pro forma” non-white supporters. In other words they are rightly called “neoconservatives” because many of them started off as anti-Stalinist leftists or liberals before moving to what passes for the “far right.”  Media Matters on the other hand attempts to explain why neoconservative media is biased and declares that, in fact, all communication is biased. They often trot out examples of neoconservative/right wing media bias, race hate, bigotry, etc, and generously explain how we can judge that bias. Never mind the fact they too are made up of defense intellectuals, corporate open border advocates, and “pro forma” non-white supporters. While Media Matters might snow job a number of news consumers the fact remains they are attacking empty suit right wing bias with Critical Theory bias, only whinier than most.

As American White Nationalists we’ll go ahead and continue to utilize, albeit carefully, a few ratings gaffs from the likes of Glen Beck and Rupert Murdoch in order to underscore our justifiable cause. And to hell with Media Matters.

Published in: on November 13, 2009 at 3:43 am  Leave a Comment  


We at EAU advocate economic nationalism, which places the economy at the service of the nation; we believe that the welfare of our people should supersede all other things, including the ability of multinational corporations and the government to exploit or ignore our people for unbridled profits and uninformed votes. But we clearly have a long way to go. I’m about as sick of being politically ethnically and morally ripped off as you are. While many of us cannot claim to be an economist or a soldier of fortune with the ability to fix the problem, “another tune” needs to be sung as soon as possible.

So don’t ever expect politicians and other know-it-alls to admit that everything is interconnected in the world of prices.

Two Russian economists, Nikolai Shmelev and Vladimir Popov, agree that “the smallest change in one element is passed along the chain to millions of others.” In other words when there is a large increase in the demand for ice cream it can raise the price of baseball mitts. Honest…

When everything is related via systems and sub-systems however distant, arbitrary government policy that sets a finicky goal has unintended consequences that, in turn, have other unintended consequences. When the federal government tried to make home ownership more “affordable” to minorities in the 1990s by coercing the very banking houses they are now bailing out to do so, that wonderful idea ripped through the economy like the flu and gave birth to the current unemployment / Titanic scenario.

Essentially, Congress directed federal regulatory agencies to lean on banks to lend money to people the banks felt could not repay the loans including properly profiled Mexicans and poor blacks. When everything started going to hell, true to form politicians pointed the finger of blame to the banks(!) in order to sidetrack our attention from their own terrible regulations.

Republicans and Democrats bear the guilt and ought to pay in a slow painful manner.

Fear of government is more effective than government itself.

Fear of government is more effective than government itself.

Only in the make believe world of Washington DC will worse regulation fix bad regulation. To say it would be a good idea to reject the poorly revised “affordable” housing Community Reinvestment Act is an understatement.

What’s more, if one looks at the spike in food prices created directly by the push to add ethanol in fuel, or if we look at the unsustainability of Medicare spending, along with the kind of government waste that would put 99.99% of the population in prison, the record of government meddling in the economy has been so unmanageable voters should realize that more regulation furthering centralized control of health care will cost us not only wealth and quality of care, but also the very freedoms our European ancestors fought and died to protect.

However commendable goals might appear to be in the mainstream media, they are not worth the institutional failure history has repeatedly taught us to expect. Like I said, when everything is related via systems and sub-systems, however distant, arbitrary government policy that sets a finicky goal will have unintended consequences that, in turn, have other unintended consequences. In this case we can ultimately & justifiably cite the abject erosion of European Americans’ political social and economic standing in the nation of their fore fathers. Facts are facts. No one voted for this insanity (except for a handful of well organized fetish leaning Bolsheviks).

On the other hand, even now in the eleventh hour we can still turn things around. But in all likelihood it’s liable to be one messy proposition. Get hot.

Let’s Back Up For a Minute

In my latest podcast entitled Time to Get Moving I opened my missive with this line:

“As many of you listening to this podcast already know national identity as practiced by European Americans … is something regarded as either against the law or a career killer in this phony era of political correctness.”

Around thirty six hours later I was contacted by our friends and allies over at Resisting Defamation who respectfully informed me that repeating this concept is a killer, and hurts what we are trying to do. While it’s easy to understand that European American activism can be blown out of proportion into the fantastic realms of breathless panic and fear  by those who truly hate, what I failed to look at is that “white” American identity is usually not that at all. Since today’s American identity is normally labeled and accepted as African-American or Mexican-American, it also means the typical white guy talking about his identify is not talking about his racial identity at all like we do at European Americans United. He is talking about his “assigned place” as an “American” devoid of his right to act and think on behalf of his threatened ethnicity, while he is free to act and think on behalf of the narrow definition of his “national identity” as given by the system.

My colleague, in part, continued: “We’ve proved here that we can expound our concept about the diverse white American peoples’ defensive political identity by making our remarks about nasty blacks, bronzes, Jews, etc. into simply remarks about the individual in question. For example, we regularly pound (verbally) the head of NAACP here, but we don’t attribute his nastiness to his skin color, his race, his continent-of-origin, his IQ…..we just “beat him up” for his use of slurs that expose his mind and heart about all the diverse white American peoples. Same with Obama: we go on the public stage (ads, community blogs) to hammer his mind and heart toward us (our people–Ed.) when we uses “acting white” (I know, that’s a stretch, but it works) or “typical white person.” But we don’t hammer his illegitimacy, his place of birth, his ultra-left politics, etc. We stick to attacking him for what his speech says about our race, not an attack based on his race. This all has to do with words and speeches (and concepts–Ed.), but there certainly is plenty of room for a diverse white American political identity.”

Good points as usual by our friends at Resisting Defamation.

Check ’em out.

Published in: on October 19, 2008 at 11:38 pm  Leave a Comment  

Betrayal to Nature’s Calling

Miscegenation, a noun, is defined as:
1. marriage or cohabitation between a man and woman of different races, esp., in the U.S., between a black and a white person.
2. interbreeding between members of different races.
3. the mixing or a mixture of races by interbreeding.

In 2006, the gonorrhea rate among black men was 25 times higher than that among white men

In 2006, the gonorrhea rate among black men was 25 times higher than that among white men

While miscegenation or “race mixing” as it is commonly referred to has been around since a short time after man decided to stand straight there has always been an unwritten code that said racial blending goes against Nature. Later, that implicit code of Nature was manifested into outward social behavior complete with penalties, and finally into explicit law. Needless to say these laws have been swept away by political correctness, which is to say that a millennium of strict adherence to racial preservation was wrong and the socio-political oligarchs who burned these laws at the stake are right.To illustrate my point I recently took a cross country flight and observed countless examples of miscegenation complete with children whose visage indicated their in uteri development was in a state of constant flux right up until they were born. No identity, no certainty — and not necessarily between blacks and whites exclusively although that pairing (black males, white females) was by far the most prominent.

(In 2005, blacks accounted for 50% of the AIDS cases diagnosed in the U.S, while being only 13% of the total population.)

At the risk of sounding cliche’ it is through movies, for example, we are subjected to images of young European American girls having sex with black men, the epitome of degeneracy. (Like commercials which are designed to alter behavior so too do motion pictures.) Through the churches we are told over and over again that we are all God’s children and race means nothing compared to “eternity” as long as we are “saved.” Of course schools universities and workplaces beat the same multicultural drum with European Americans targeted for self immolation. Of course it doesn’t help that European American groups do not receive the same federal and corporate financial backing as non-white advocacy groups receive.

To become a healthy people again we have to to do many things in a different way as a nation.  The things we teach our children, and the way we teach them is directly connected to the nature of society, and we can certainly see the results of abdicating that responsibility to the state and the media can’t we? At least in many cases. The kind of government we want, the way the economy works, and the perception people have of themselves is directly tied into the conditioning and education of our young people. If our young people fail because of our inaction, or worse, our laziness, everything else including our genetic continuity will fail, too.

Everything in Nature has a purpose, and humans, like all other species (humans are NOT a race) of the earth, have an instinct that calls them to only mate with others that look, act, and basically share the same genetic origins as themselves. There is nothing criminal or unfavorable in doing so, although there are those who are working to ensure it is. The natural instinct to stay amongst one’s own kind serves the purpose of keeping ALL species of man diverse, so that all species as a whole is less likely to become extinct by a catastrophic or freak occurrence.

In other words while so-called “racism” breeds true diversity, miscegenation through biracial birth rates results in NO diversity. How is that a good thing?

A typical advertisement designed to specifically alter the viewer's perception of themselves.

A typical advertisement designed to specifically alter the viewer's mind.

However, as you can see in the enclosed photographs of the young ladies and their “love interests,” pictures which epitomizes how “progressive” we are in 2008 there is still somewhat of a long way to go in terms of an awakening, but were getting there.

Published in: on October 16, 2008 at 5:59 pm  Comments (6)