Media Matters And The Neocons

They shouldn’t fool anyone, but they do.

George Soros funded / hyper leftist / Marx pandering TV “watch dog group” Media Matters has its collective panties in a knot because Fox News big shot Rupert Murdoch has publicly agreed with fellow neocon Glen Beck that President Obama is a racist. “He was right,” said Murdoch.
In July 2008, Glenn Beck notoriously declared that he believes President Obama is “a racist” with a “deep-seated hatred for white people or the white culture.” For a dyed in the wool neocon who regularly condemns even the remotest form of American white nationalism this is big news. Of course, Beck’s comments played a key part in at least 80 bedwetting advertisers dropping their support of his television program. Various media outlets and talking heads admonished his comments, but Fox News let Beck slide. Why? Because Rupert Murdoch, chairman of News Corp., the parent company of Fox News, says he agrees that President Obama is a racist. Moreover Murdoch went on to say: “And, you know, that was something which perhaps shouldn’t have been said about the president, but if you actually assess what he was talking about, he [Beck] was right.” Media Matters says this is a new low even for Fox, and it is a low they cannot let slide.

NOTE; American White Nationalists have been warning their fellow Americans about Obama’s race hate for years prior to his White House bid. Thanks Rupert.

Therefore George Soros funded / hyper leftist / Marx pandering TV “watch dog group” Media Matters now wants to hold Rupert the Neocon responsible and command that he apologize for his own “intolerable” remarks. They have even gone so far as to reserve some of their unlimited bandwidth in order to deliver signatures to News Corp and demand Murdoch apologize via\action\murdochapology.

Never mind the fact non-white groups have been making off with billions of dollars of taxpayer operating money, specifically in order to maintain their ethnic platforms. Not a peep about it.

The way Media Matters sees it “this type of race-baiting is par for the course for Fox News.” They even cite Fox News president Roger Ailes who has imitated the far left by spending “the better part of his career working as a Republican media consultant, during which time he became known for appealing to racial fears and biases for political gain. Under Ailes’ leadership Fox News routinely employs these same tactics in its ongoing campaign to destroy the Obama administration and the progressive agenda.”  (They actually mean their Frankfurt School / Critical Theory agenda.)

But let’s keep it real here. Glen Becks’ remarks about Obama are an anomaly, and he would just as soon allow himself to be ripped to shreds taking on “white racists” like Jared Taylor or Professor Kevin McDonald. As a neoconservative Beck is part a cabal whose core group consists of neoconservative defense intellectuals, corporate open border advocates, and “pro forma” non-white supporters. In other words they are rightly called “neoconservatives” because many of them started off as anti-Stalinist leftists or liberals before moving to what passes for the “far right.”  Media Matters on the other hand attempts to explain why neoconservative media is biased and declares that, in fact, all communication is biased. They often trot out examples of neoconservative/right wing media bias, race hate, bigotry, etc, and generously explain how we can judge that bias. Never mind the fact they too are made up of defense intellectuals, corporate open border advocates, and “pro forma” non-white supporters. While Media Matters might snow job a number of news consumers the fact remains they are attacking empty suit right wing bias with Critical Theory bias, only whinier than most.

As American White Nationalists we’ll go ahead and continue to utilize, albeit carefully, a few ratings gaffs from the likes of Glen Beck and Rupert Murdoch in order to underscore our justifiable cause. And to hell with Media Matters.

Published in: on November 13, 2009 at 3:43 am  Leave a Comment  


We at EAU advocate economic nationalism, which places the economy at the service of the nation; we believe that the welfare of our people should supersede all other things, including the ability of multinational corporations and the government to exploit or ignore our people for unbridled profits and uninformed votes. But we clearly have a long way to go. I’m about as sick of being politically ethnically and morally ripped off as you are. While many of us cannot claim to be an economist or a soldier of fortune with the ability to fix the problem, “another tune” needs to be sung as soon as possible.

So don’t ever expect politicians and other know-it-alls to admit that everything is interconnected in the world of prices.

Two Russian economists, Nikolai Shmelev and Vladimir Popov, agree that “the smallest change in one element is passed along the chain to millions of others.” In other words when there is a large increase in the demand for ice cream it can raise the price of baseball mitts. Honest…

When everything is related via systems and sub-systems however distant, arbitrary government policy that sets a finicky goal has unintended consequences that, in turn, have other unintended consequences. When the federal government tried to make home ownership more “affordable” to minorities in the 1990s by coercing the very banking houses they are now bailing out to do so, that wonderful idea ripped through the economy like the flu and gave birth to the current unemployment / Titanic scenario.

Essentially, Congress directed federal regulatory agencies to lean on banks to lend money to people the banks felt could not repay the loans including properly profiled Mexicans and poor blacks. When everything started going to hell, true to form politicians pointed the finger of blame to the banks(!) in order to sidetrack our attention from their own terrible regulations.

Republicans and Democrats bear the guilt and ought to pay in a slow painful manner.

Fear of government is more effective than government itself.

Fear of government is more effective than government itself.

Only in the make believe world of Washington DC will worse regulation fix bad regulation. To say it would be a good idea to reject the poorly revised “affordable” housing Community Reinvestment Act is an understatement.

What’s more, if one looks at the spike in food prices created directly by the push to add ethanol in fuel, or if we look at the unsustainability of Medicare spending, along with the kind of government waste that would put 99.99% of the population in prison, the record of government meddling in the economy has been so unmanageable voters should realize that more regulation furthering centralized control of health care will cost us not only wealth and quality of care, but also the very freedoms our European ancestors fought and died to protect.

However commendable goals might appear to be in the mainstream media, they are not worth the institutional failure history has repeatedly taught us to expect. Like I said, when everything is related via systems and sub-systems, however distant, arbitrary government policy that sets a finicky goal will have unintended consequences that, in turn, have other unintended consequences. In this case we can ultimately & justifiably cite the abject erosion of European Americans’ political social and economic standing in the nation of their fore fathers. Facts are facts. No one voted for this insanity (except for a handful of well organized fetish leaning Bolsheviks).

On the other hand, even now in the eleventh hour we can still turn things around. But in all likelihood it’s liable to be one messy proposition. Get hot.

White Excuses

During the first week of September 2009 the following four news stories were posted nearly back to back at EAU’s news site, WVWN:

CNN’s Roland Martin: “Largely White” Opposition To Obama’s Speech To School Kids

Feds Investigating Claims of (white) Vigilantism in Post-Katrina New Orleans

Newsweeks’ War On White People

Obama Is Fast Losing White Voters’ Support

Why these four stories all appeared on the news wires, not just our news site, in the space of several days is somewhat striking to me. What you’re looking at is four negatively charged accounts concerning white people in America; all of which can be directly tied in to Barack Obama  while preceding his return to Washington from his vacation at Martha’s Vineyard.

Here’s the way I think we can all safely regard this confluence of negative accounts of white Americans. Somewhere someone sent up a signal that Barack Obama’s planned change for America is failing, and failing badly.  Its failing not because he’s doing anything wrong. Its failing not because he’s black, perish the thought. Still everyone in Obama’s orbit agrees that he’s failing. Therefore, the media and their sychophants in Washington DC want to make sure that when, not if, Barack Obama’s hope and change for America takes a screaming nose dive that the appropriate villain will be to blame: white people.  Less than a year into his presidency and the excuses are being floated.

I mean think about it. Prior to Obama’s  Tuesday speech to America’s school children and prior to his Wednesday speech on healthcare these four stories popped up like mushrooms in a cow pattie. That tells me certain movers and shakers know no one is buying his empty canned rhetoric anymore and the bigshots need the right excuses to explain why the jig is up.

You’ve got CNN’s Roland Martin, a mouthy black know-it-all, saying that white people are the primary opposition to Barack Obama’s speech to our school kids (so what if they are) and that kind of implicit solidarity simply shouldn’t be tolerated, right?

You’ve got the black attorney general Eric Holder sending a squad of nosy G-men down to New Orleans to bolster the rumor that ‘white militia’s’ went on a black folk killing spree following hurricane Katrina.

Then there’s Newsweeks’ hand-wringing guilt fest describing the fact that white children as young as six months old are still noticing things like race, that its a horrifying thought to think of white kids being proud of their identity.

And last but not least we see the LA Times breathlessly trotting out the news that Obama’s support among white voters is dropping faster than the Dow.

All four pieces were put out there to say one thing loud and clear: as Barack Obama’s policy failures continue to be rejected by the voters, it will be white voters in the here and now and their evil spawn kids in the dim-lit future that will be primarily to blame for the lack of hope and change Barack promised his ethnic and ideological sychophants.

Until these Obamacidal maniacs reach that highly refined state of phony systemic equality, the track record of which is at the expense of white Americans, then all of their efforts will have been in vain regardless of how lofty their ideals or noble their intent.

Because when it all crashes and burns excuses will be made and it can only result in one thing: payback time for you know who.


Published in: on September 9, 2009 at 3:34 am  Leave a Comment  

Fascist Cradles

How bizarre it is when liberals, leftists and other maniacs suggest that nations where abortion is a “right” are more “democratic” than others. Standing in the shadow of Planned Parenthood, which is the equivalent of a baby slaughterhouse, these creatures bawl that policies backed by the baby slaughterhouse are utterly essential to democratic government and that opposition to those policies is something akin to being undemocratic or fascist.


In the United Sates alone abortion on demand did not come from the ballot box with people physically voting for representatives (on the state or federal level) who would legalize the operation of baby slaughterhouses. No, instead it was unelected Supreme Court “justices” undemocratically imposing abortion “rights” on the masses through the dreadful Roe v. Wade decision in 1973 backed up by the fire power of the police and the federal government. Of course, even the most determined lawmaker who has attempted to impose the most benign restrictions on the baby slaughterhouses, appointed unelected judges have gleefully struck down those limitations and thwarted the alleged “will of the people.”

Needless to say, while sentient people oppose the death of any blameless infants, European Americans who so far are destined for minority status in the next few decades can benefit the most without this horrible practice (Podcasts: How to have more white babies). Then again, it has been by slow imperceptible degrees that people have been financially manipulated and systemically induced to embrace the stainless steel sink over the cradle.

This is called “freedom.”

In China, abortion was imposed by the end of a rifle and threats of prison by unelected bureaucrats as it was in the Soviet Union—again, pulling an end run around the will of the people. In other words, tragic regularity is the hallmark of abortion on demand enforced by antidemocratic ways.

Baby slaughterhouses are not the epitome of freedom, but they are the embodiment of fascism.

Published in: on May 5, 2009 at 1:38 am  Comments (1)  

Mark Levin: Busted

An open invitation for them to return is now in effect.

Conservative talk show host and author  Mark Levin’s new book, “Liberty and Tyranny: A Conservative Manifesto,” has just hit the bookstores and from what I’ve been hearing over the last few days it has been well received, to say the least. Mr. Levin’s fellow conservatives have done nothing but rave over this book, describing it in almost mystical terms with one reviewer describing Mr. Levin as the new Thomas Paine. Apparently, conservatives in Washington have forgotten who they are and what they stand for; so Mr. Levin has written a succinct yet defining instruction aid for not only our elected officials who claim to be conservative, but also for firing up the masses, who will in turn — be more conservative. In the era of Saul Alinsky’s acolyte Barack Hussein Obama this book apparently could not have come at a better time.

No, I haven’t read Mark Levin’s book. Regardless, I’m going to comment on its high-profile release, my impression of the excerpts I’ve seen, and the media reaction I’ve been observing. The gist I’m getting from the pundits and book reviewers is that this volume will allegedly resonate with greenhorn conservatives & old guard conservatives for ages to come; defining once and for all without a hint of obscurity what the founding fathers intended for the United States to be and how its government should operate. Basically, Levin’s book says government should exist only for the preservation of liberty; that it should not allow for a federal establishment that continues to expand no matter who (or what party) happens to control the executive branch. In his book he describes an out of control federal bureaucracy as a malignant intrusive creature.
“It churns out a mind-numbing number of rules that regulate energy, the environment, business, labor, employment, transportation, housing, agriculture, food, drugs, education, etc. Even the slightest human activity apparently requires its intervention: clothing labels on women’s dresses, cosmetic ingredients, and labeling. It even reaches into the bathroom, mandating showerhead flow rates and allowable gallons per flush for toilets. It sets flammability standards for beds.”

Well, who in his right mind wouldn’t agree with that assessment?

In fact the few times I’ve listened to Mr. Levin host his radio program he has stuck to this argument faithfully describing a bloated federal government that creates a “culture of conformity and dependency, where the ideal citizen takes on drone-like qualities in service to the state, where persons must be bled dry of individuality and confidence, and frightened away from independent thoughts and behavior.” Instead Mr. Levin envisions a society where the American citizen “is recognized and accepted as more than an abstract statistic or faceless member of some group; rather, he is a unique, spiritual being with a soul and a conscience.”

Mark Levin also points out how the 17th Amendment, ratified in 1917, stripped state power from the state legislatures of the authority to appoint senators and purposely deprived them of a meaningful role in the federal government, thus giving the citizenry an unfamiliar sense of the Constitution.  Of course we can also thank the “statists” version of education for that sorry state of affairs.

Overall, there doesn’t seem to be much to disagree with here. So without having read the book “Liberty and Tyranny: A Conservative Manifesto,” and listening to the accolades from his high profile conservative allies I come away from all this with the impression that Mark Levin believes the size of the federal government must be decreased; that Republicans have lost their promise to limited government and have become the party of big government. Mr. Levin seems to oppose appropriations not authorized within the enumerated powers of the Constitution- a Constitution that each member of Congress swore to uphold. He definitely wants to lower taxes and has railed in the past that the current income tax laws assume that people are guilty and they have to prove they are innocent. He condemns the role of the Federal Reserve for the national debt and for creating inflation; that Congress needs to cut down on spending, reassess monetary and spending policies, and stop borrowing heavily from foreign investors. Yes, this all sounds good to me. I think we can safely assume his book’s message, which is rooted in the legacy of the founding fathers, will be greeted warmly and enthusiastically from not only his loyal conservative listeners but also to his associates in government — who are legion.

Failures Of Our Age

Failures Of Our Age

Sounds good, doesn’t it? With the release of this book are we finally going to see a return to limited government and a universal conviction to personal freedom, freedom of association, morality, etc at the skilled hands of a truly Constitution oriented president, legislature and judiciary? I doubt it. Why? Well because we as nation, not to mention Mark Levin, had that chance but it was flushed away. All of the above position statements, all of the clear, minimal, states’ rights oriented constitutional mandates accompanied by the philosophical underpinnings that originated in Europe and were transferred here by the Founding Fathers that Mark Levin extols – was expressed almost perfectly when Dr. Ron Paul was running for president. But you see, for the same policies he claims to adhere to and long for in our nation  Mark Levin excoriated, insulted, diminished and attacked Ron Paul and his supporters better than any liberal Marxist “statist” could have ever done. He and his pals Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, and other neoconservatives ignored and pooh-poohed Dr. Paul’s nearly identical platform contained in Mark Levin’s book; and moreover which utter from their crooked mouths on a daily basis from their radio perches. No, Rudolph Giuliani John McCain, Mike Huckabee, Fred Thompson and others were the preferred choice because they all sang from the same globalist war bird sheet music prepared by the supporters of their corporate organizers.


Moreover, all of these “candidates” subscribe to racial and cultural equality and racial blending — to the point of believing and having us believe the Founders could have been Mexicans who created the “shining city on the hill” we are now allegedly composed of. It was –and is—media ghouls and parasites like Levin that shape mold and characterize the political landscape, who point out the parallel path of the Marxist “statists” that people should take — in order to arrive at a place where even demagogue leftist are comfortable. Putting aside the inevitable policy differences we may have had with Dr. Paul, among them being he did not possess one single white preservationist bone in his body, our chance to at least struggle and rebuild a truly Constitutional government with Ron Paul at the helm was subverted by people like Mark Levin, a fraud and influence peddler if ever there was one.
So why did he write his damned book?


“Who is Frank Roman?”

Published in: on March 26, 2009 at 3:13 am  Comments (5)  

The Forbidden Thoughts Of Quiet Men

I’ve been a little surprised lately at the talk I’ve been hearing from a few acquaintances of mine. People with varying backgrounds and disparate tastes — from a doctor and a warehouse worker, to a biker and a part time musician– all have been speaking quietly about the unsettling political landscape they not only see but feel. They don’t like what’s going on with this schizophrenic economy.

They don’t like the guy in the White House and his socialist-looking policies, either.

It appears alienation and fragmentation are seeping into their psyches from numerous vectors in the form of toxic propaganda; as the rest of their people appear to be living in denial. They see the high profile leaders of the US and the world, who babble endlessly from Fortress Untouchable and yet say nothing, are unable to allay anyone’s fears in terms of international upheaval, domestic unrest, and political and social corruption.

The world has become a dark threatening thunderhead about to unleash full blown hell.

These people I speak of, who are minding their own business, who are paying their share of taxed Federal Reserve Notes while obeying the law — like they are now — have begun talking about things that go along with guns and canned goods; with one of them having purchased a firearm and a healthy serving of ammunition for the first time in his life. Maybe it’s because he and the others, who don’t even know each other, are sensing something is wrong, very wrong, with the very fabric of existence becoming threadbare enough to expose the ugliness lurking on the other side. Maybe what was once, to many of us, safely implicit has now become dangerously explicit. To them there has been a shift in civilization’s  machinery, and it has thrown closed an intuitive switch in the minds of only the most perceptive.

Take a look at the following….

Dec 23 2008, NY Post

Are you afraid that the economic downturn could get out of hand? I mean, really out of hand?

Well, don’t worry.

The US Army War College is on the case – ready to handle “unforeseen economic collapse” and the “rapid dissolution of public order in all or significant parts of the US.”

And you thought we were just dealing with a recession!

In a report published Nov. 4 – just in time for the holiday season – the War College’s Strategic Studies Institute posited a number of shocks that the country should be prepared for, including unrest caused by the economy’s failure.

The report has a snappy title, “Known Unknowns: Unconventional ‘Strategic Shocks’ in Defense Strategy Development,” and was written by Nathan Freier, a visiting professor at the college. The foreword was written by Col. John A. Kardos, director of the Peacekeeping and Stability Operations Institute.

Freier lists a number of possible things we should worry about – because we probably don’t have enough of our own – including run-of-the-mill terrorism and the fact that China and Russia could align against us politically and economically.

“Some of the most plausible defense-relevant strategic shocks remain low-probability events,” Freier soft-pedals before going on to scare the hell out of us.

The War College says “widespread civil violence inside the US would force the defense establishment to reorient priorities in extremis to defend basic domestic order and human security.”

Among things Freier wants us to worry about are “deliberate employment of weapons of mass destruction. . . unforeseen economic collapse, loss of functioning political and legal order, purposeful domestic resistance or insurgency and catastrophic natural and human disasters.”

Oh, and by the way, have a Merry Christmas!

And a Happy New Year, too?

If the fundamental principles of our economy are so great, as Bush Obama and McCain have said, and President Obama is so dead set that his economic stimulus will save or “create” 4 million jobs, then why are our armed forces preparing for “economic riots”? Not only that, why is the Federal Government funding the construction of  ‘detention centers?’

And then there’s this:

Rep. Alcee L. Hastings, D-Fla., has introduced to the House of Representatives a new bill, H.R. 645, calling for the secretary of homeland security to establish no fewer than six national emergency centers for corralling civilians on military installations.

The proposed bill, which has received little mainstream media attention, appears designed to create the type of detention center that those concerned about use of the military in domestic affairs fear could be used as concentration camps for political dissidents, such as occurred in Nazi Germany.

Okay, so he forgot to mention “Uncle Joe” Stalin’s network of gulags-of-death-for-dissidents to which the United States turned a blind eye after the war.

We who oversee the daily operation of EAU fully believe the spirit of European Americans will never be crushed by force of arms, nor by decades of toxic propaganda, or even by a treacherous plutocratic elite groveling to yet another special interest.

The way I see it: the next four years are going to be the most important years of your life, if the above articles have any credence. I believe they do. If and when things take a screaming nosedive into the abyss of naked totalitarianism, a cohesive and dedicated subset of the European American population is going to be desperately needed, and needed badly.

While we urge our people to partake of the all important task of regaining their rightful place in America as it was intended by the Founding fathers — by whatever legal means necessary– we also urge them to take a second look at a more fundamental kind of thinking in terms of survival and progress.

Link 1

Link 2

Published in: on February 3, 2009 at 2:26 am  Leave a Comment  

John McCain in a “Nutshell”

The other day, when I saw former presidential candidate Senator John McCain bloviating about his desire to work on “comprehensive immigration reform” (you know, amnesty) with President elect Barack Hussein Obama, I pulled up the following quote he made during his run for the White House:

“We are a nation of many races…(and) many points of origin. But our one shared faith is the belief that a nation conceived in an idea will prove stronger, more enduring, and better than any nation…made from a common race or culture.”-Senator John McCain

What a guy. We have to wonder if this very thought had ever passed through the mind of Senator McCain –when and if– he ever walked the streets of Tokyo Japan (or even Saigon) with its nearly one hundred percent homogeneous population?

"Racism" at its finest, right Senator?

"Racism" at its finest, right Senator?

Concerning the nations in Africa we would bet he had to suppress this thought, however.

Post apartheid paradise


The Fish and Wildlife Service tells us that before a plant or animal group can receive protection under the Endangered Species Act, concerned persons must bring it to the attention of the proper authorities who then verify these concerns before putting it on the Federal list of endangered wildlife and plants. An “endangered” species is one which is threatened by extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its home. In other words, the life form in question is at risk of becoming extinct because it is either not reproducing or is threatened by changing environmental factors — or it’s being killed off by predators.

Only a few of the many species in the animal kingdom which are at risk of extinction obtain legal protection. Unfortunately, many more species become extinct, or potentially will become extinct, without gaining public notice. A few of the creatures that could very well face extinction are the Siberian Tiger, the Silverback Gorilla, the American Bison, the California Condor and the Loggerhead Sea Turtle, just to name a few. Certainly, many people have heard of these wonderful animals; and if these animals were to become extinct, at the end of the day a very small but vocal segment of the population (including myself) would decry this sad event while the rest would give two-flips-to-the-wind about it. Concerning the only other thing that might awaken the indolent sector of Americans to actually care about preserving something –(that) would be an immediate threat to their television viewing habits.

So while we cannot expect the US Fish and Wildlife Service to put persons of European descent on the list of endangered “species” let me state here and now – for the public record – that European Americans United believes that a corresponding entity such as the United Nations really should do exactly that. According to the U.S. Census Bureau sometime last year in 2007, the so-called “minority” population of the United States reached the 100 million mark. That means only two-thirds of Americans are whites of non-Hispanic background.  In four states – Hawaii, New Mexico, California and Texas – non-Hispanic whites are a distinct yet dwindling minority, complete with the cultural baggage of the interlopers overwhelming the landscape. The inexorable vector towards a less and less white United States will continue, even if U.S. borders could be hermetically sealed, because the younger the age of the demographic group, the less white they are. mccain-globalist1

Virtually half the nation’s children under the age of five are Hispanic, black or Asian. What’s more in 2006, the black American population officially reached 40 million. Because Blacks are regularly undercounted, we can assume that the real number is a lot more than 40 million. While the black population isn’t growing as fast as Hispanics – who are also undercounted — and Asians, European Americans are barely increasing their numbers at all; opting instead for abortion, birth control and childless families in order to facilitate their “careers.”

In other words the racial graffiti is on the wall. And just exactly what does that graffiti say? According to a 2008 Pew Research Center paper the population of the United States will grow to 438 million in 2050 from 296 million in 2005 if current population trends continue. Non-Hispanic whites – European Americans — will account for 47 percent (or less) of the total in 2050. By that time, one in every five “Americans” will be a foreign-born or Third World immigrant, compared to one in eight in 2005. That means 67 million Third World persons will be added to the population plus another 50 million of their children for a mind-boggling total of 117 million people. (EDITOR’S NOTE: Like Hillary Clinton and John McCain, Barak Obama must love this) Race does matter, and when the non-white majority continues to expand in scope, power, and influence our nation will descend into chaos. diversityAnd you can forget about affirmative action for our people, bank on it. All you need to do is look at places like the previously Boer White South Africa and French abandoned Haiti to understand this dangerous reality. As a matter of fact, elsewhere in the West and for the same reasons Britain is about to fall to the steady march of the Muslims and Australia will soon collapse under the weight of the Asians and Middle Easterners. You know as well as I do the vast majority of Third World immigrants will never admit there are flaws in their own culture that create the problems they are trying to move away from, which can only mean the same problems will follow them and be recreated in the countries to which they move. Like I’ve said before, our enemies in high places here in the United States have all but discarded their masks since they no longer feel compelled to hide their true intentions.  After all, when you observe the magnitude and velocity of our changing cultural and demographic trends toward a non-white America it is clear some where along the way “someone” decided the United States had reflected the people of Europe long enough — and it was time to for a change. Their malicious objective is on full display now; and as far as I am concerned their hearts are blacker than a lump of coal in a boxcar headed to Dachau.
If an awakening doesn’t come soon European Americans are permanently fated for minority status by the middle of this century if not sooner. But don’t look for that awakening or the information cited in this broadcast to come from mouths of people like Shawn Hannity, Rush Limbaugh or any particular strain of politician, clergy or university professor. They would find themselves cast into the outer darkness by their own colleagues faster than you can say ‘liars and damned liars.’ So it’s up to you. Remember…in the disciplines of biology and ecology, extinction is the ending of a way of life for a group (or race) which in turn actually reduces the precious diversity the politically correct crowd likes to squawk about. Any group (regardless of its ethnos) will become extinct when it is no longer able to survive in changing conditions or against superior competition. The moment of extinction is generally considered to be the death of the last individual of that species (although the capacity to breed and recover may have been lost long before this point). Because a species’ home range may be very large or scattered, determining this moment is difficult, and is usually done with hindsight. Now of course I am referring to European Americans in a worst case scenario — if the analogy wasn’t lost on you. But as it stands — according to the information we cited above — in 2050 if our people are unable to survive or reproduce in our own environment, and unable to move to a new environment where we can do so, we will eventually die out and become extinct if not pseudo extinct.And yet many Americans and their European cousins abroad continue to whistle past the graveyard at midnight preferring insipid distractions and mindless pursuits. They are utterly clueless about the future.

And while I cannot accurately predict what that future will bring in terms of either upheaval or enlightenment you can be sure something unpleasant could very well be in the works.

Let's hope not.

Let's hope not.

Published in: on December 17, 2008 at 11:30 pm  Leave a Comment