Needless to say there is much trepidation in the ranks of the neocons over the (possible) impending election of the Mocha Messiah, Barack Hussein Obama. Yes, I know that’s a crude thing to say but when it comes down to it that’s exactly what he is, or purports to be by way of the media. (Just ask any one of his ninetieth percentile racially conscious black voters.) Neoconservative talk radio has spared no ammunition trying to marginalize Obama’s efforts to be the next Socialist in Chief, and leading this pack of corporate talkers is our old friend Rush Limbaugh. Not even the onset of a Bill Clinton presidency caused Rush to become so inflamed.

In response to a massive nationally broadcast Obama infomercial scheduled for 29 October and which has already aired — I’ll catch it on YouTube– earlier in the day Rush had posted a preemptive rebuttal to Obama’s impending gas baggery. Below you will see a couple of important paragraphs from his speech. My comments are in red.


= Roman

“And so it is, my fellow Americans, that I urge you to reject Barack Obama and his cynical campaign for president.  I urge you to reject the policies and the wording of the charismatic demagogue.  Barack Obama condemns the United States Constitution, our highest law, because it does not empower him to redistribute the income of the middle class and give it to people who do not work.”

I’d say it could be argued that the redistribution of wealth “anti racists” such as Rush decries would have come at a much slower pace, and possibly stopped, had the United States remained majority Euro homogenous. National cynicism was put into motion well before the Marxist Sixties, which is when it finally came to fruition while charismatic demagoguery was perfected alongside a tidal wave of advanced media technology.  The United States went from a  robust homogenous self sustaining European derived nation to one that decided to embrace multiculturalism and political correctness as a way to undermine not only itself but Western culture overall. Through the mantra of “tolerance” the next generation empowered itself to not only open the borders to the Third World (and encourage radical feminism and white abortion) but to also redistribute European Americans income by way of anti Western multiculturalism.

Obama condemns our judicial system not because it’s too liberal and too activist, but because it will not impose his left-wing policies by judicial fiat.  Obama believes that the tax code should be used not to fund the legitimate purposes of government, but to massively expand the size and power of the federal government.  It’s time for change.  It is time for the kind of change that has made this country great and the change we seek, the change that matters is change that expands our liberty, expands opportunities, expands wealth creation, and expands our horizons.  It is time to celebrate capitalism, not demonize it.  It’s time to celebrate success, not punish it.  It is time to ignite our economy, not smother it.

These “changes” Rush refers to were already in place, so what he ought to be saying is that it’s time to change things back to what they were. Left wing policies, the size and power of the federal government, an onerous tax code were all but non-existent when the United States was racially homogenous; when ethical men walked the halls of power prior to the non-stop brainwashing of multiculturalism. Now European Americans who were once self avowed yet marginalized Marxists are now the majority chanting for free stuff over freedom.

Barack Obama speaks the language of the socialist.  Barack Obama peddles class warfare.  He peddles human envy. This is not what American leaders do.  This is not what would-be American presidents should do.  This is the tactic of the authoritarian, to create animosity, to create anger, to create fear, all for the purpose of undermining the strength and the unity of our society.

Strength and unity used to exist when the United States was comprised of one community of people originating from Europe. Absent the fight against established Western culture and institutions that were deeply corrupted by Marxist-inspired creeds in the 60’s and 70’s, no Constitution or Bill of Rights will succeed in capturing that unity until race realism is drilled into everyone’s head, specifically the craniums of most European Americans, and peaceful segregation is achieved. Class warfare and human envy have always been with us, but a nation of similar derived people can more easily overcome these maladies by way of a common ancestry and common values; reinforced without the cries of tolerance for racial equality muddling up the ideological landscape.

Barack Obama comes from a long line of ideologues who puts the interests of big government above the interests of the individual and the interests of the family.  He seeks to replace the American entrepreneurial spirit with government regulations and mandates.

Rush would agree at least implicitly that the use of multiculturalism hides the fact that we have misplaced or abandoned not only control over our national borders but placed government over the interests of the family by redefining the family. However, under the banner of racial and cultural Oneness this would be harder to achieve though not impossible.

James Madison, Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, Ronald Reagan, all embraced the principle that America was a different place because of its respect for the individual.

That’s part of the problem. The Founders understood that a nation was comprised of one people, who all looked alike and spoke the same language. Madison, Jefferson and Lincoln were race realists and race loyalists. Ronald Reagan was not. America was different because of its people, a people who realized and implemented their freedom from the best ideologies and traditions of Europe. This respect for the individual as we used to know it could not have been achieved had, say; the United States was founded under similar conditions by Haitians or Mexicans.

They did not talk about the government redistributing wealth.  They did not talk about the government punishing success.  They did not talk about the government reregulating the economy.  They did not say that paying more taxes was patriotic.

Nowadays, the federal government redistributes an overly large portion of middle class wealth to illegal immigrants, mostly Mexicans but not limited to them and their heavily larded advocacy groups; groups who make no bones about the reality that they wish to replace European Americans.

Published in: on October 30, 2008 at 2:34 am  Leave a Comment  

Let’s Back Up For a Minute

In my latest podcast entitled Time to Get Moving I opened my missive with this line:

“As many of you listening to this podcast already know national identity as practiced by European Americans … is something regarded as either against the law or a career killer in this phony era of political correctness.”

Around thirty six hours later I was contacted by our friends and allies over at Resisting Defamation who respectfully informed me that repeating this concept is a killer, and hurts what we are trying to do. While it’s easy to understand that European American activism can be blown out of proportion into the fantastic realms of breathless panic and fear  by those who truly hate, what I failed to look at is that “white” American identity is usually not that at all. Since today’s American identity is normally labeled and accepted as African-American or Mexican-American, it also means the typical white guy talking about his identify is not talking about his racial identity at all like we do at European Americans United. He is talking about his “assigned place” as an “American” devoid of his right to act and think on behalf of his threatened ethnicity, while he is free to act and think on behalf of the narrow definition of his “national identity” as given by the system.

My colleague, in part, continued: “We’ve proved here that we can expound our concept about the diverse white American peoples’ defensive political identity by making our remarks about nasty blacks, bronzes, Jews, etc. into simply remarks about the individual in question. For example, we regularly pound (verbally) the head of NAACP here, but we don’t attribute his nastiness to his skin color, his race, his continent-of-origin, his IQ…..we just “beat him up” for his use of slurs that expose his mind and heart about all the diverse white American peoples. Same with Obama: we go on the public stage (ads, community blogs) to hammer his mind and heart toward us (our people–Ed.) when we uses “acting white” (I know, that’s a stretch, but it works) or “typical white person.” But we don’t hammer his illegitimacy, his place of birth, his ultra-left politics, etc. We stick to attacking him for what his speech says about our race, not an attack based on his race. This all has to do with words and speeches (and concepts–Ed.), but there certainly is plenty of room for a diverse white American political identity.”

Good points as usual by our friends at Resisting Defamation.

Check ’em out.

Published in: on October 19, 2008 at 11:38 pm  Leave a Comment  

From Iraq: With Love and Dishonor

I have always resented NPR (National Public Radio) and their squishy sentimental pap. Their artsy coffee-house, insolent approach never fails to grate and irritate whenever I’m in the mood for a little cerebral masochism. Yes, I should know better. But I digress.

We are now treated to the story of a European American Marine stationed in Iraq who meets an Iraqi woman, Munira Shahamorad, fleeing an abusive brother and a life under the all-concealing black robes of Islam. Sgt. Steve Campbell of Ozark, Mo. and his exotic Iraqi girlfriend began having an illicit love affair on the base. The long and short of it is they eventually came to the United States, got married and had two children. Of course, just to ensure anyone listening has a different idea they are described as “any other American couple.” When their financial affairs took a nose dive following Sgt. Campbell’s honorable discharge, a diagnosis of PTSD, an injury he suffered as he worked a construction job, his wife now named “Venus” took a job as a stripper. Nice.

Additionally, we have to wonder what Sgt. Campbell’s views are with regard to the fact that while US Marines were being shot and killed in Iraq as they militarily secured whole cities and neighborhoods in the name of “democracy” that their own government has allowed the southern border with Mexico to remain as porous as a screen door on a submarine. And since my own experience tells me that Mexicans constitute a vast portion of construction workers it is feasible for me to believe that Sgt. Campbell worked with many of them.

Of course, NPR is presenting this tale with an implicit sympathy that bears out all the trappings of an ongoing effort toward multiculturalism. As far as NPR and unfortunately Sgt. Campbell is concerned “Venus” was just another “American” waiting to happen before she left her Muslim country; yet another Third World person who is able to replace a European American woman not only in a family setting but as a citizen. The fact that she has to strip in order to make ends meet only serves as sympathetic fodder for NPR to exploit white guilt upon an already deracinated listening public. Yes, it’s implicit, but it’s quite real.

Of course throughout history military personnel have always regarded an opposing enemies women as ‘booty’ for the taking, often by rape. It’s a tragic heartrending fact of life in the world of war; and no one denies its never happened, with people of European origins being no exception on either side of the issue. Following the dire warnings of George Washington who advocated the avoidance of entangling alliances overseas would have done much, at least in modern history, to have curtailed such tragedy.

But thanks to the culturally ambivalent efforts of publicly funded outlets like NPR and the willingness of people like Sgt. Campbell to listen, European Americans are destined for minority status by 2042.  Demographic trends which are regularly pitched by such informed bodies as the US Census Bureau, the United Nations, with a multitude of researchers, authors and public figures all in agreement: if modern abortion rates, attrition rates, and migration trends persist we will find ourselves a minority in a land that was originally meant to be a satellite of Europe’s people. Miscegenation of course plays a huge role in our racial demise.

No, there isn’t room here for everyone because they have an abusive family like “Venus” has; or as long as their paperwork is in order or they have the right attitude like the tolerance mongers at NPR like to say. Race does matter and the Founding fathers understood this quite well. In fact we all understood this “quite well” until a certain class of ‘subverters’ took their long march through the institutions and the media.  We can safely assume then that Sgt. Campbell was never informed or taught to care that as the non-white majority continues to develop in scope, power, and authority our nation will descend into chaos like Iraq has between the Shiites, Sunnis and Kurds. All you need to do is look at other places like the previously Boer South Africa and French abandoned Haiti to understand this. As a matter of fact, elsewhere in the West and for the same cause Britain may fall to the steady march of the Muslims (not if the BNP can help it) and Australia will soon collapse under the weight of Asians and Middle Easterners.

No one can convince me other wise that Mr. Campbell could not have found a supportive and beautiful European American woman to raise his children. -- FR

No one can convince me other wise that Mr. Campbell could not have found a supportive and beautiful European American woman to raise his children. -- FR

But don’t look for NPR to face these issues with any semblance of race realism. In all of these places white Western people are being pushed, cajoled, whispered to and shouted at; generally scared to death to accept their self immolation by “progressive” churches, Marxist universities, and a variety of tax funded (NPR) non-white racial advocacy and rights groups. Lineage, ancestry and a desire to remain in the future by way of one’s distant continuity has been subverted and cleansed from a healthy portion of our people’s consciousness. And an Iraqi wife brought home by a lonely European American soldier is only one manifestation of those who view our people’s United States as nothing more than an economic playground and social experiment laboratory.

But we’re working on it.

Published in: on October 19, 2008 at 9:26 pm  Comments (1)  

Betrayal to Nature’s Calling

Miscegenation, a noun, is defined as:
1. marriage or cohabitation between a man and woman of different races, esp., in the U.S., between a black and a white person.
2. interbreeding between members of different races.
3. the mixing or a mixture of races by interbreeding.

In 2006, the gonorrhea rate among black men was 25 times higher than that among white men

In 2006, the gonorrhea rate among black men was 25 times higher than that among white men

While miscegenation or “race mixing” as it is commonly referred to has been around since a short time after man decided to stand straight there has always been an unwritten code that said racial blending goes against Nature. Later, that implicit code of Nature was manifested into outward social behavior complete with penalties, and finally into explicit law. Needless to say these laws have been swept away by political correctness, which is to say that a millennium of strict adherence to racial preservation was wrong and the socio-political oligarchs who burned these laws at the stake are right.To illustrate my point I recently took a cross country flight and observed countless examples of miscegenation complete with children whose visage indicated their in uteri development was in a state of constant flux right up until they were born. No identity, no certainty — and not necessarily between blacks and whites exclusively although that pairing (black males, white females) was by far the most prominent.

(In 2005, blacks accounted for 50% of the AIDS cases diagnosed in the U.S, while being only 13% of the total population.)

At the risk of sounding cliche’ it is through movies, for example, we are subjected to images of young European American girls having sex with black men, the epitome of degeneracy. (Like commercials which are designed to alter behavior so too do motion pictures.) Through the churches we are told over and over again that we are all God’s children and race means nothing compared to “eternity” as long as we are “saved.” Of course schools universities and workplaces beat the same multicultural drum with European Americans targeted for self immolation. Of course it doesn’t help that European American groups do not receive the same federal and corporate financial backing as non-white advocacy groups receive.

To become a healthy people again we have to to do many things in a different way as a nation.  The things we teach our children, and the way we teach them is directly connected to the nature of society, and we can certainly see the results of abdicating that responsibility to the state and the media can’t we? At least in many cases. The kind of government we want, the way the economy works, and the perception people have of themselves is directly tied into the conditioning and education of our young people. If our young people fail because of our inaction, or worse, our laziness, everything else including our genetic continuity will fail, too.

Everything in Nature has a purpose, and humans, like all other species (humans are NOT a race) of the earth, have an instinct that calls them to only mate with others that look, act, and basically share the same genetic origins as themselves. There is nothing criminal or unfavorable in doing so, although there are those who are working to ensure it is. The natural instinct to stay amongst one’s own kind serves the purpose of keeping ALL species of man diverse, so that all species as a whole is less likely to become extinct by a catastrophic or freak occurrence.

In other words while so-called “racism” breeds true diversity, miscegenation through biracial birth rates results in NO diversity. How is that a good thing?

A typical advertisement designed to specifically alter the viewer's perception of themselves.

A typical advertisement designed to specifically alter the viewer's mind.

However, as you can see in the enclosed photographs of the young ladies and their “love interests,” pictures which epitomizes how “progressive” we are in 2008 there is still somewhat of a long way to go in terms of an awakening, but were getting there.

Published in: on October 16, 2008 at 5:59 pm  Comments (6)  

American Genocide: Inaction is Not an Option

You might as well get used to it.

This blog and our future pod casts over at Western Voices World News will, at any given opportunity, continue to address the ongoing racial destabilization process running amok in the United States as we speak. As far as I am concerned it would be akin to resisting the process of water boarding. No man or woman in their right mind would passively allow themselves to endure the sensation of drowning for hours on end without a monumental fight for their lives. We, the indigenous American men and women of European descent are being water boarded to death; and so far no one is kicking open the door to stop it. At least not anyone who wears the undeserved title of elected representative.

So like I say: get used to it. Playtime is over. Put away your moldy old flags and Germanic-sounding greetings. It doesn’t work and it never will. It’s time to get real. You can start by getting married and having children as soon as possible. No joke.

As my first Word Press post I have chosen  excerpts from an essay/pod cast yours truly produced not all that long ago.

Be safe.


On our European Americans United homepage under the heading Our Position on Immigration we say — and zealously believe – the following:

“In any given nation, cultures and civilizations are the result of the experience of the basic foundational people and their values. In Europe and European-derived nations like America, our people are under the demographic threat of unchecked Third World immigration and the consequent destruction of our unique way of life. As more and more Third World immigrants pour across our borders in America and Europe, they will unquestionably change our traditions, our cultures, and even our forms of government. Our ideals of democracy, individual freedom, and personal responsibility are unique and exist in this form among no other peoples of the world; we wish to preserve these ideals and pass them along to future generations of European Americans.

We recognize that, should our nation ever attain a non-European majority, our ways of life will be forever lost; they will be replaced by the ways of life cherished by the Third World populations who will then control our political process. America’s culture and political system will then, of course, simply reflect its Third World majority—it will begin to resemble Mexico, or Haiti, or Cuba. In European Americans United, we want more for our children and the future generations of our families.”

Now I think that’s a fairly straight forward statement of purpose, don’t you?

According to an exhaustive study by the National Policy Institute: “The big population story of the 21st Century is shaping up to be the status reversal of whites and blacks and the Indian baby boom. A side bar will be the single digit minority role that whites will assume. Of the 7 population groups studied, only whites are projected to sustain an absolute decline in numbers. In 1950 whites and blacks were respectively 27.98% and 8.97% of world population. By 2060 these figures will almost reverse as blacks surge to 25.38% and whites shrink to 9.76%. From (the year) 2010 the white population will decline while blacks will add 1.2 billion to their numbers. In this time frame the Indian subcontinent will gain 1.2 billion people. These groups and their governments will be looking for elbow room, and the diminished presence of whites in Europe, and especially in the relatively wide open spaces North America, will provide such an opportunity. Specifically, countries like Canada, the United States, Argentina, Brazil, Australia, New Zealand, and Russia can expect to be pressured to accept collectively hundreds of millions of refugees from India, and sub-Sahara Africa.”

Of course, NPI are not the first to point this out and they won’t be the last. But the circumstances around us remain unbroken. That’s right – Genocide. In 1948 the United Nations defined genocide — in part — as “acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, … deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life, calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.” I don’t know about you but that sounds exactly what the NPI report and others have been saying is taking place right now; that certain entities are inflicting on the group – us — conditions of life, calculated to bring about our physical destruction in whole or in part.”

They’re not doing it with shotguns, rifles and pistols. They’re not doing it with fighter jets. They’re not even doing it with tanks, rocket launchers, or even roadside bombs. No, they’re committing genocide against white America with bought and paid for legislation, greed, political correctness and public policy disguised as being moral. Why? Because they know all too well about our people’s systemically induced racial apathy, a racial apathy they themselves have put into place through their outlets in the media, the universities and in the halls of power. You don’t even have to listen to what they say to understand their intentions. Just look at what the results of their deadly policies have been.

It’s called genocide when miscegenation is viewed as decent; genocide when you see a white girl with non-white children; genocide when they say we are all equal and is enforced by law; genocide when accepting or rejecting diversity could mean your job; genocide when non-whites are given preference over whites in the private sector; genocide when white kids portray themselves in public as wiggers; genocide when we permit another illegal Mexican to demand his “rights;” genocide when our children are taught their ancestors are historically evil; genocide when a healthy white baby is dismembered in the womb; genocide when we lose the sovereignty of our nation while the system, which we did not directly elect, is deliberately inflicting on our people conditions of life, calculated to bring about our physical destruction in whole or in part.”

Now the big question is: what are you going to do about it?

Published in: on October 15, 2008 at 5:27 pm  Leave a Comment